Checks the model
It answers whether the geometry is sound and whether it breaks the rules you configured. It was never asked which manufacturing process would accept the part as drawn.
Fabdose reads one STEP file on your computer and gives you a manufacturability verdict in about a minute. Run it before you pick a process, a supplier, or a tool, while the answer is still cheap to act on.
Ready right after signup
(First time you open it, takes a minute or two to get set up on your computer, and that happens just once.)
File Info
pcie-bracket-rev3.stp
ABS
Process
Injection Molding
Analysis
8 Detected
Rule-BasedOverall Status
Critical Issues
Undercut Detected
@ Face 47
Critical undercut, requires complete redesign or advanced mold technique detected at face 47 (angle: 41.2°). Measured 41.2° against a 5° ceiling for undercuts that need no action.
Redesign geometry to eliminate undercut.
Short Shot Risk
@ Predicted (100.0 vs 75)
Amorphous materials with Tg>60°C have stricter flow length limit due to higher viscosity. Flow length over minimum wall reaches 100.0 against the 75 limit for ABS.
Increase wall thickness to material minimum.
Wall Too Thin
@ Location not found
Wall thickness 0.82 mm is below minimum 1.14 mm for ABS. This one is measured across the whole shell, so it is not pinned to a face on the 3D model.
Increase wall thickness to meet material minimum.
Warpage Risk
@ Predicted (0.73 vs 0.3)
Wall variation above 30% causes an uneven cooling rate, then differential shrinkage, then bow. Measured variation is 0.73 against the 0.3 limit.
Equalize wall thickness within ±30% of nominal.
Brittleness Risk
@ Predicted (0.31 vs 0.5)
Sharp internal corner concentrates stress, initiating brittle crack under load. The measured fillet is 0.31 of the adjacent wall against a 0.5 minimum.
Apply internal fillet R ≥ 0.5 × adjacent wall thickness (preferred 0.75 × T).
Draft Angle Insufficient
@ Face 12
Draft angle 0.5° at face 12 is below minimum 2.0°.
Increase draft angle to minimum requirement.
Draft Angle Insufficient
@ Face 63
Draft angle 1.2° at face 63 is below minimum 2.0°.
Increase draft angle to minimum requirement.
Sink Mark Risk
@ Predicted (0.73 vs 0.3)
General thickness variation rule. Above ±30% it causes uneven shrinkage and sink at thick zones. Measured variation is 0.73.
Reduce rib thickness to ≤60% of wall thickness.
Material Properties
ABS (Standard)
Compatibility
Marginal
Alternatives
PC
+30% cost, +40% impact strength
PP
-20% cost, -15% strength
Priority Actions
Redesign geometry to eliminate undercut
Increase wall thickness to meet material minimum
Increase draft angle to minimum requirement
Process Parameters
Cycle Time
17.4 s
207 parts/hr
Yield Rate
89%
Industry standard 95-98%
Lead Time
3-5 weeks
+5 days first article
Regional Cost Comparison
BETAKorea vs China vs Vietnam vs USA
Complexity
Quantity
10,000 unitsSouth Korea
@ 10,000 units
China
@ 10,000 units
Vietnam
@ 10,000 units
USA
@ 10,000 units
Modeled regional benchmarks, not live supplier quotes. Last updated: 2026-04
Suggested Solutions
Redesign geometry to eliminate undercut
$0 (mold cost) — Medium
Identify alternative design approach → Adjust angles to allow straight pull → Validate structural integrity
Increase wall thickness to meet material minimum
±10-20% cycle time — Low
Check material minimum wall thickness requirement → Increase wall to recommended thickness → Verify structural integrity → Check flow length with new thickness
Increase draft angle to minimum requirement
$0 — Low — 2 faces affected
Identify faces with insufficient draft → Increase draft to 2° minimum (smooth) or 3° (textured) → For deep features, use 5° draft → Verify dimensional tolerances still met
When you find out
By then you have waited a week and called the design done. The check that decides which process takes your part, and what it costs, is the one nobody runs on your behalf.
It answers whether the geometry is sound and whether it breaks the rules you configured. It was never asked which manufacturing process would accept the part as drawn.
And they will tell you. On the quote call, days after the file went out, once you have already picked a direction and moved on.
The one check that decides where the spend goes is the one that lands after the spend is hard to undo.
Fabdose runs that check first. One STEP file, read on your computer against the rules of the process you pick, in about a minute.
Injection molding gets a face-by-face review, with exact undercut and draft locations on the model. For CNC, sheet metal, and the other eight processes, Fabdose applies that process's rule set, measuring what it can find in the file and stating the rest as rules for you to check. Ten processes, one STEP file.
ABS / PC / PP / PA / POM +5
Per-face analysis
ABS / PC / PP / Aluminum +6
Rule-based
PC / PP
Rule-based
ABS / PP / PC / PMMA
Rule-based
PA / PEEK
Rule-based
Early coverage, expanding
ABS / PA / PC-ABS / TPU / PEEK
Rule-based
Early coverage, expanding
Aluminum / Steel / Brass / Stainless Steel / Magnesium
Rule-based
Steel / Aluminum / Brass / Stainless Steel
Rule-based
Aluminum / Brass / Magnesium
Rule-based
(alloy grades)
Aluminum / Steel / Stainless Steel / Brass
Rule-based
Coming next: sand casting, forging, investment casting, on the v0.5 roadmap.
Instead of naming one process, let Fabdose run your file through every process that fits your material. Each one comes back with its own suitability score, how many findings it hit, and how many of those are critical. Coverage depth differs by process, so the scores tell you where to look rather than which process wins. Your CAD tool checks the model. This checks the model against a process you have not picked yet.
See Pro pricingHow it works
Drop a .step or .stp file into Fabdose on your computer, up to 50MB, one part per run.
Choose the process you have in mind and the material. Or pick Auto Comparison and let Fabdose run every process that fits that material.
About a minute, depending on how complex the part is. Your CAD file does not move, and nothing waits behind anyone else's job.
Findings ranked critical through low, each with the measured value and the value the process requires. For injection molding, undercut and low-draft faces are pinned on the 3D model.
Free covers 5 analyses, one named process at a time. An account is required, a card is not.
What comes back
For injection molding, undercuts and low draft come back as exact locations on the model, face by face. For the other processes the findings are rule checks across the whole part, and the viewer says which is which instead of inventing a location.
Runs without heavy CAD like Fusion 360 or SolidWorks. Desktop app for macOS and Windows.
Your CAD files are never uploaded. Defect findings are processed by AI and synced to your account.
Why local
No upload, no NDA, no security review, no waiting for a revision to be cleared for release. That is what local is for here. It makes the check available at the moment you actually need it, mid-iteration, on a file that is not finished. Your CAD files are never uploaded. Defect findings are processed by AI and synced to your account.
Five analyses free, no card. One STEP file, on your computer, about a minute. Because the cheapest time to learn that a process will not take your part is before you have picked one.
Pro is $35 a month, a little over a dollar a day, for unlimited analyses and Auto Comparison across every process that fits your material. See Pro
This site uses analytics and session-recording cookies to understand how designers use Fabdose and to improve the product. Your CAD files are never involved. See our Privacy Policy.